Sample document by StudioAcquire — Cerelia is a fictional brand; every finding here is invented to show the format · all demos
StudioAcquire The $750 teardown · sample document Sample document

StudioAcquire · Funnel & Offer Teardown · sample — fictional client, invented findings

Cerelia — where the new-client money leaks, in dollars

Prepared for the owners of Cerelia, a fictional six-location med-spa group · Sample dated July 2026
This is the exact document a $750 engagement produces — same ten sections, same math discipline, same terms. Only the client and the findings are invented.

01The one-line read

Cerelia's brand already does the convincing — the leak is that the $59 first-visit Glow Facial vanishes the moment someone clicks Book Now, and a first-timer is then asked to self-navigate 24 services across six locations at full price.

~$4,800 / month
the recoverable pool Zenoti's published numbers put on this booking path: ~$800 per location per month in abandoned bookings × 6 locations. One pool, not per-leak sums — the three leaks below overlap, and honest math doesn't stack them.

02How this was built

Everything in a live teardown comes from walking the client's public funnel the way a first-time guest meets it: the marketing site, the offers as advertised, and every Book Now target, on desktop and phone. Each observation is dated, screenshots go in an evidence folder the client can ask for on the call, and every claim is re-checked live the morning of the readout — if anything changed, it's said out loud rather than shown stale.

What a teardown is not: no test bookings, no forms submitted, no logins, and nothing that requires access to the client's systems. The document reads the funnel from the outside, which is exactly how the next thousand new clients will read it. The build phase, if it happens, runs on read-only Zenoti reporting access — nothing more.

03The walk — the funnel as a first-timer meets it

#StepWhat happensWhat carries
1Homepage"$59 first-visit Glow Facial" is the hero offer
2Book NowRoutes to the stock Zenoti webstore on a branded subdomainTracking parameters only. No offer, promo, or discount rides the link.
3The webstoreStandard services list: 24 services, 6 categories, six-location chooserThe $59 offer is nowhere on screen at the moment of decision
4CheckoutThe first-timer books at list price — the offer they clicked for never reappears

Sample note: in a live teardown every row above carries a dated observation and a screenshot reference, and anything that can't be reproduced on verification day is cut rather than softened.

04Leak #1 — the $59 offer dies at the Book Now click

The acquisition offer is invisible at the moment of decision.

The offer built to win the first visit lives on the marketing site, but the booking link carries nothing — so the person who clicked because of the $59 Glow Facial arrives at a full-price services list. The two halves of the funnel never speak. Zenoti's own published data prices that gap: their median online-booking conversion is 13% while their top decile runs 32% on the same webstore product, and the difference is almost never demand — it's what happens between the offer and the checkout.

BUILDA per-location intro page that carries the $59 into the booking flow — offer above the fold, one clear path, the discount represented where the guest actually books. Carrying a promo through checkout ran +128% promo revenue year over year on my studios; the working pattern is the booking-funnel demo on this site.

05Leak #2 — 24 services, six locations, no guided first visit

A first-timer has to self-diagnose before they can spend money.

Menu breadth is an asset for regulars and a wall for newcomers: facial or peel or laser or injectable, then which location, then which provider, then which time. Med-spa first-timers mostly don't know what to book, and a raw service list converts that uncertainty into an exit. With a bigger menu, conversion is choice architecture — guide the new guest to the right first treatment fast, and keep the full menu for people who already know.

BUILDSplit the new-client path from the returning-client path: a three-question "find your first treatment" picker, a curated most-popular-first-visit shortlist, and location pre-selection so paid traffic never faces the six-location chooser cold.

06Leak #3 — the not-ready first-timer has nowhere to go

The funnel only serves the person ready to self-book right now.

Pricing appears only inside the booking system, and there is no consult-first route on the money path — so the price-shy or undecided visitor, often the highest-lifetime-value guest deciding between two brands, simply leaves. Every off-ramp for the unsure is also an on-ramp the funnel currently doesn't have.

CONFIGA prominent consult path in the booking flow and first-visit expectation copy on the intro page. Mostly configuration and placement, not new engineering.

Also noted, unpriced: Book Now leaves the site at peak intent, and the membership tiers (Core / Flex / Transform) are pitched to people who haven't had a first visit yet — a strong second-visit offer doing new-client duty.

07The money — on the vendor's own numbers

Every figure here is Zenoti's published data: median online-booking conversion 13%, top decile 32%, and roughly $800 per location per month in recoverable abandoned bookings. Across six locations that's the ~$4,800/month pool on the cover — recurring, before any ad spend is touched. The three leaks are the mechanism; the pool is the ceiling; fixing leak #1 alone typically captures the largest share, which is why it's ranked first.

Sample note: the live version of this section also places the client against StudioAcquire's benchmark set — every multi-location Zenoti funnel reviewed to date, so an operator sees exactly where they sit in their own market. The benchmark rows stay anonymized in both directions.

08The intro offer against the local set

A live teardown benchmarks the client's intro offer and list prices against every assisted competitor in their two strongest trade areas — offers quoted verbatim and dated, the same carry test applied to each competitor's booking links. The table below is invented to show the format; every operator in it is fictional.

Operator (all fictional)First-visit offerList anchorCarried into booking?
Cerelia$59 Glow FacialSignature facial $145No — dies at the link
Auralie Skin Studio$79 first facial$135Yes — rides to checkout
Fernhollow Med Spanone published$150n/a
Cobalt & Sage Aesthetics20% off first treatment$160No — dies at the link
Prim Aesthetics Bar$99 intro duo$140Yes — dedicated intro page

The three findings this table always produces: where the offer sits in the local price range and whether that position is on purpose; which side of the carry line the client is on while competitors' offers survive the click; and one observation about pricing architecture worth a conversation — flagged, not redesigned, because pricing strategy is retainer work.

09What's already working — protect it

The review base is genuinely strong — in this sample fiction, 4.8★ across 2,100+ reviews — and nearly absent from the booking path. Redeploying it onto the intro page costs nothing and does real work.

The menu categorization is clean — six tidy categories serve returning clients well. Nothing here says simplify the menu; it says stop making it the front door for strangers.

The membership tiers are a strong retention offer — introduced after the first visit instead of before it, they convert better and stop competing with the intro offer.

10The fix, sequenced — and what happens next

OrderFixLabelWhat it unblocks
1Carry the $59 into the booking flow (intro page + offer-carrying links)BUILDThe largest share of the pool; ad spend stops paying for full-price sticker shock
2Guided first-visit path + location pre-selectionBUILDChoice paralysis becomes a bookable decision in under a minute
3Consult path + first-visit expectation copyCONFIGThe undecided majority gets an on-ramp
4Pace-to-goal visibility on all of it, weeklyONGOINGThe month is visible while it can still be saved — this layer is the forecasting dashboard demo on this site

The readout: 45 minutes, the client's screen, this document — re-verified that morning. The three leaks get walked live on the real site, then both sides decide whether the build is worth doing.

The terms: the teardown is the $750 engagement, delivered 7–10 days from payment, and the document is the client's to keep either way. If the work continues within 7 days of the readout, the full $750 credits against month one of the retainer ($3,500–$6,500/month by location count, quoted at the readout).

Benchmarking consent: anonymized, non-identifying findings may join the cross-market benchmark set — never the client's name, never their numbers, opt out with one line.

— StudioAcquire

StudioAcquire · Funnel & Offer Teardown · sample documentCerelia is fictional — every finding invented · July 2026

This, on your real funnel

The sample above is invented end to end. Yours would be built from your live funnel and your Zenoti numbers, verified the morning you see it — same ten sections, same math, same terms.

Email hello@studioacquire.com